<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decision Mechanics? Or Judgment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matrixed.org/wordpress/strategic-execution/164/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matrixed.org/wordpress/strategic-execution/164/</link>
	<description>The analyst's acuity. A humorist's irony. Hearing the silence between the notes. Seeing both object and space, in minimalist and in Japanese art. Holding to the values beyond conflicting goals; reaching for the larger frame beyond the crisis. Spotting the patterns, navigating the chaos.  How to think, how to manage.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:07:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://matrixed.org/wordpress/strategic-execution/164/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrixed.org/wordpress/?p=164#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I am reposting what seems to have been a lost reply to your comment, Mary; my apologies. 

I think &quot;decision&quot; has been defined into different scopes and limits by different literature  - but the short answer is yes, &quot;decision&quot; here is meant to denote a reference to an external or objective basis - though not necessarily mutually accepted.

&quot;Judgment&quot; seems to connote something more amorphous, perhaps involving personal values.  In the old days, we&#039;d hear of judgments based on this or that law or precedent - external or objective norms.  Now, judges are limited to merely ruling on procedures and are not supposed to &quot;legislate&quot; or impose their own moral values from the bench.  But the common usage seems to denote a preponderant reliance on personal bases.

That said, in neuroscience writings, I see &quot;decision&quot; used more generically as the end result of however the analytical process might have been.

The semantics are all over the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reposting what seems to have been a lost reply to your comment, Mary; my apologies. </p>
<p>I think &#8220;decision&#8221; has been defined into different scopes and limits by different literature  &#8211; but the short answer is yes, &#8220;decision&#8221; here is meant to denote a reference to an external or objective basis &#8211; though not necessarily mutually accepted.</p>
<p>&#8220;Judgment&#8221; seems to connote something more amorphous, perhaps involving personal values.  In the old days, we&#8217;d hear of judgments based on this or that law or precedent &#8211; external or objective norms.  Now, judges are limited to merely ruling on procedures and are not supposed to &#8220;legislate&#8221; or impose their own moral values from the bench.  But the common usage seems to denote a preponderant reliance on personal bases.</p>
<p>That said, in neuroscience writings, I see &#8220;decision&#8221; used more generically as the end result of however the analytical process might have been.</p>
<p>The semantics are all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Y. Tisdale</title>
		<link>http://matrixed.org/wordpress/strategic-execution/164/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Y. Tisdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrixed.org/wordpress/?p=164#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Your use of &quot;decision&quot; in contrast to &quot;judgment&quot; here implies that a &quot;decision&quot; is objective, or based on a mutually accepted reference basis;  &quot;judgment&quot; then would be more of an interpretation, an opinion or a choice based on non-absolute references such as moral standards.  Is that a fair summation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your use of &#8220;decision&#8221; in contrast to &#8220;judgment&#8221; here implies that a &#8220;decision&#8221; is objective, or based on a mutually accepted reference basis;  &#8220;judgment&#8221; then would be more of an interpretation, an opinion or a choice based on non-absolute references such as moral standards.  Is that a fair summation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

